Between Signifier and Signified: Some Crossroads within Susan Sontag’s Work
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes two of Susan Sontag’s most notorious essays —“Against interpretation” (1964) and Illness as Metaphor (1978)— to explore its argumentative lines and its ways of interweaving the different thoughts and their implicit ideas. In both texts it is possible to recognize a certain iconoclastic gesture, consisting in going, from the literary essay, against interpretation, on the one hand, and against metaphor, on the other. The following reflections explore not only the parallelisms, but also and more importantly, the differences between both texts, and the gestures involved in them. If in “Against interpretation” Sontag pleads for the signifier, suspending meaning (while labeling the search for the signified as conservative and authoritarian), in Illness as Metaphor is it possible to recognize a necessity of restoring a signified
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All contents of this electronic edition are distributed under the Creative Commons license of "Attribución-shareAlike 4.0 Internacional" (CC-BY-SA). Any total or partial reproduction of the material must mention its origin.
The rights of academic works published in this publication belong to their authors., who grant to AISTHESIS: Revista Chilena de Investigaciones Estéticas the license for its use. The management of the permits and the authorization of the publication of the images (or of any material) that contains copyright and its consequent rights of reproduction in this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors of the articles