El hilo de Ariadna se ha roto o la historia ya no tiene un lugar sistematico. Un estudio critico sobre las posiciones postmodernas
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A fragmentation consciente, a collage and montage writing, the European "postmodern" speech liberates philosophy from the obligation of settling continuities and identities, of thinking the origin and basis, seeking lineal, systematic and ultimate thruths. Its argumentative strategy revolves about a negative paradigm: the absence of a systematic place for history. An improvement of modernity or an ineluctable reformulation of this one? This article explores, critically and synthetically, the main arguments that, about the matter, take part in the dialog between French and German contemporary philosophers, such as Michel Foucault, Jean-Frarnois Lyotard, Gilles Deleuze, Paul Virilio, Theodor Adorno, Walter Benjamin or Peter Sloterdijk.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All contents of this electronic edition are distributed under the Creative Commons license of "Attribución-shareAlike 4.0 Internacional" (CC-BY-SA). Any total or partial reproduction of the material must mention its origin.
The rights of academic works published in this publication belong to their authors., who grant to AISTHESIS: Revista Chilena de Investigaciones Estéticas the license for its use. The management of the permits and the authorization of the publication of the images (or of any material) that contains copyright and its consequent rights of reproduction in this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors of the articles