Antonio Romera: sieges on his critical work
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the first section, this article revises certain considerations that supported art criticism in Chile during the first half of the 20th century. It analyses certain biases that characterized the critical discourse of the period, influenced by exogenous determining factors. The objective is to show how art criticism focuses more on the circumstances and contexts, rather than on the analysis of the aesthetic text itself. It refers to authors such as Ricardo Richon Brunet and Nathanael Yánez Silva. The second part examines the gravitating presence of the Spaniard, Antonio Romera, in Chile, who became the theoretical organizer of the history of national painting. Some key aspects of his theoretical approaches are analysed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All contents of this electronic edition are distributed under the Creative Commons license of "Attribución-shareAlike 4.0 Internacional" (CC-BY-SA). Any total or partial reproduction of the material must mention its origin.
The rights of academic works published in this publication belong to their authors., who grant to AISTHESIS: Revista Chilena de Investigaciones Estéticas the license for its use. The management of the permits and the authorization of the publication of the images (or of any material) that contains copyright and its consequent rights of reproduction in this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors of the articles