Agenda-building and issue salience: the Water Code reform in the Chilean Press

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.62.92106

Palabras clave:

código de aguas, reforma política, Chile, agenda-building, medios digitales, análisis textual

Resumen

This study analyzes how Chilean digital media shaped the salience of the Water Code reform (2014–2022) from an agenda-building perspective. Based on a text-pattern analysis of 349 articles published in five online outlets, it examines how media type, content format, and author background influenced which policy issues were prioritized. The analysis identifies five main topics that structured the media agenda: (1) the legislative reform process, (2) the water crisis, (3) sustainable water use, (4) water rights, and (5) the symbolic dimension of water privatization. Clear differences emerged across outlets: mainstream, corporate-owned newspapers emphasize institutional and legal aspects, while independent and progressive media prioritizes environmental and social concerns. Content format played a key role: news articles focused on the legislative process, whereas opinion pieces engaged in broader ideological discussions, particularly on the symbolic meaning of water privatization and the socioenvironmental stakes of reform. Author background also determined how issues were highlighted: journalists generally adopted a neutral and institutional framing, while academics, activists, and legal experts stressed the socioenvironmental challenges and the need for sustainable solutions.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

David Leroy, Universidad Autónoma de Chile

David Leroy, doctor en Medio ambiente y sociedades por la Universidad de Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (Francia). Tras ocupar puestos posdoctorales en la UNAM (México) y la Universidad Autónoma de Chile, actualmente es investigador posdoctoral en el Instituto Smithsonian de Investigaciones Tropicales (Panamá). Su investigación aborda la vulnerabilidad y la adaptación de comunidades rurales a riesgos ambientales, la percepción social del medioambiente y la gestión comunitaria de recursos naturales. Ha participado en proyectos en varios países de América Latina y publica en revistas internacionales de alto impacto.

Octavio Avendaño, Universidad de Chile

Octavio Avendaño, doctor en Ciencia política por la Universidad de Florencia, Italia. Profesor y director del departamento de Sociología de la Universidad de Chile. Ha impartido docencia de pregrado y posgrado en la facultad de Gobierno de esa universidad, así como en la Universidad Alberto Hurtado y en la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Profesor visitante en la Universidad de Extremadura (España), la Universidad de Bérgamo (Italia), la Universidad de Roma La Sapienza (Italia) y la Universidad de Georgetown (EE.UU.).

Citas

Aguado-Guadalupe, G., & Bernaola, I. (2022). Agenda building en medios alternativos y cooperativos españoles: temáticas, uso de fuentes y prácticas colaborativas (Agenda building in Spanish alternative and cooperative media: topics, use of sources and collaborative practices). Comunicación Y Sociedad, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.32870/cys.v2022.8103

Arceneaux, P., Albishri, O., Anderson, J., & Kiousis, S. (2024). Dynamics of campaign, press, and public discourse in electoral politics. Journalism Studies, 25(2), 117-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2289891

Aruguete, N. (2017). Agenda building. Revisión de la literatura sobre el proceso de construcción de la agenda mediática (Agenda Building. A Literature Review of the Construction Process of the Media Agenda). Signo YPensamiento, 36(70), 36-52. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.syp36-70.abrl

Avendaño Pavez, O., Osorio Gonnet, C., & Vergara Vidal, J. (2022). Controversias hídricas e intereses privados en Chile. Los grupos de interés frente a la reforma al Código de Aguas, 2014-2020 (Water Disputes and Private Interests in Chile. Interest Groups Regarding the Reform of the Water Code, 2014–2020). Estudios Políticos, (63), 269-294. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.espo.n63a11

Azios, M., Irani, F., Rutland, B., Ratinaud, P., & Manchaiah, V. (2020). Representation of Stuttering in the United Sates Newspaper Media. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet, 24(4), 329-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/15398285.2020.1810940

Baker, C. E. (2007). Media concentration and democracy: Why ownership matters. Cambridge University Press.

Binderkrantz, A. S., Christiansen, P. M., & Pedersen, H. H. (2015). Interest group access to the bureaucracy, parliament, and the media. Governance, 28(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12089

Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Georgetown University Press.

Bolados García, P., Henríquez Olguín, F., Ceruti Mahn, C., & Cuevas, A. S. (2018). La eco-geo-política del agua: una propuesta desde los territorios en las luchas por la recuperación del agua en la provincia de Petorca (Zona central de Chile) (An Eco-Geo-Politic of Water: A proposal from the Territories in the Struggles for the Reclamation of Water in Petorca Province (Central Zone of Chile)). Revista Rupturas, 8(1), 159-191. https://doi.org/10.22458/rr.v8i1.1977

Borgias, S. L. (2018). "Subsidizing the State:" The political ecology and legal geography of social movements in Chilean water governance. Geoforum, 95, 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.06.017

Boyer, A.-L., Le Lay, Y.-F., & Marty, P. (2021). Coping with scarcity: The construction of the water conservation imperative in newspapers (1999–2018). Global Environmental Change, 71, 102387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102387

Budds, J. (2020). Securing the market: Water security and the internal contradictions of Chile's Water Code. Geoforum, 113, 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.09.027

Budds, J., & O'Reilly, K. (2023). Reforming Water Governance in Chile: A Hydrosocial Relations Perspective. Journal of Latin American Geography, 22(3), 151-159. https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2023.a915672

Celume Byrne, T. (2022). Reconocimiento legal del derecho humano al agua y sus implicancias en los principios que informan el Código de Aguas (Legal recognition of the human right to water and its implications in the principles that inform the Water Code). Revista de derecho ambiental, 2(18), 35-61. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-4633.2022.67944

Curtin, P. A. (1999). Reevaluating public relations information subsidies: Market-driven journalism and agenda-building theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research, 11(1), 53-90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1101_03

Danner, H., Hagerer, G., Pan, Y., & Groh, G. (2022). The news media and its audience: Agenda setting on organic food in the United States and Germany. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131503

De Bruycker, I. (2019). Blessing or curse for advocacy? How news media attention helps advocacy groups to achieve their policy goals. Political Communication, 36(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1493007

Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting. Sage.

Denham, B. E. (2010). Toward conceptual consistency in studies of agenda-building processes: A scholarly review. The Review of Communication, 10(4), 306-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2010.502593

Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815

Dunaway, J., Branton, R. P., & Abrajano, M. A. (2010). Agenda setting, public opinion, and the issue of immigration reform. Social Science Quarterly, 91(2), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00697.x

Esmark, A., & Schoop, S. R. (2017). Deserving social benefits? Political framing and media framing of ‘deservingness’ in two welfare reforms in Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(5), 417-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716688262

Espírito Santo, P. (2024). Anticipatory approach to war and agenda building: a content analysis study of Portuguese press coverage of the Ukraine war (2014–2023). Frontiers in Political Science, 6, 1341515. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1341515

Fenton, N. (2010). New media, old news: Journalism and democracy in the digital age. Sage.

Firmstone, J. (2008). The editorial production process and editorial values as influences on the opinions of the British press towards Europe. Journalism Practice, 2(2), 212-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780801999378

Gentes, I., & Policzer, P. (2024). Weakness by design: Neoliberal governance over mining and water in Chile. Territory, Politics, Governance, 12(9), 1372-1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2134196

Gronemeyer, M. E., & Porath, W. (2017). Tendencias de la posición editorial en diarios de referencia en Chile: El arte de dosificar la crítica frente a la actuación de los actores políticos (Trends of the editorial viewpoints in reference newspapers in Chile: The art of balancing criticism of the performance of political actors). Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 37(1), 177-202. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-090x2017000100008

Groseclose, T., & Milyo, J. (2005). A measure of media bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1191-1237. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097542

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.

Haselmayer, M., Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. (2017). Partisan bias in message selection: Media gatekeeping of party press releases. Political Communication, 34(3), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1265619

Iyengar, S., & Reeves, R. (Eds.). (1997). Do the media govern? Politicians, voters and reporters in America. Sage.

Jacobs, R. N., & Townsley, E. (2011). The space of opinion. Media intellectuals and the public sphere. Oxford University Press.

Jorgensen, K. W. (2002). Understanding the conditions for public discourse: four rules for selecting letters to the editor. Journalism Studies, 3(1), 69-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700120107347

Kamboh, S. A., Ittefaq, M., & Jamil, S. (2024). Powerful News Sources Versus Advocate-Journalists as Factors Affecting the Editorial Agenda-Building on Sustainable Development Goals. Journalism Practice, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2369917

Kiousis, S., Kim, J. Y., Ragas, M., Wheat, G., Kochhar, S., Svensson, E., & Miles, M. (2015). Exploring new frontiers of agenda building during the 2012 US presidential election pre-convention period: Examining linkages across three levels. Journalism Studies, 16(3), 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2014.906930

Kiousis, S., Mitrook, M., Wu, X., & Seltzer, T. (2006). First-and second-level agenda-building and agenda-setting effects: Exploring the linkages among candidate news releases, media coverage, and public opinion during the 2002 Florida gubernatorial election. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18(3), 265-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1803_4

Kiousis, S., Park, J. M., Kim, J. Y., & Go, E. (2013). Exploring the role of agenda-building efforts in media coverage and policymaking activity of healthcare reform. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90(4), 652-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013503157

Lang, G. E., & Lang, K. (1981). Watergate: An exploration of the agenda-building process. In D. Protess, & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), Agenda Setting. Readings on Media, Public Opinion, and Policymaking (pp. 277-289). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315538389

Mathes, R., & Pfetsch, B. (1991). The role of the alternative press in the agenda-building process: Spill-over effects and media opinion leadership. European Journal of Communication, 6(1), 33-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323191006001003

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176-187. https://doi.org/10.1086/267990

McCombs, M., & Valenzuela, S. (2007). The agenda-setting theory. Cuadernos.Info, (20), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.20.111

Nava, M., & Marques, F. P. J. (2019). From "leftist" to "president": journalism and editorial coverage of Brazil's Lula in five elections. Journalism Practice, 13(10), 1200-1221. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1587640

Navia, P., & Osorio, R. (2015). El Mercurio Lies, and La Tercera Lies More. Political Bias in Newspaper Headlines in Chile, 1994–2010. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34(4), 467-485. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12364

Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2023). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2023. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://doi.org/10.60625/risj-p6es-hb13

Nicolas-Artero, C. (2023). The international and historical dimensions of Chilean water bureaucracy. Water International, 48(4), 480-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2023.2220512

Nielsen, R. K. (2010). Participation through letters to the editor: Circulation, considerations, and genres in the letters institution. Journalism, 11(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884909350641

Núñez-Mussa, E. (2021). Crisis of trust and a precarious industry. In J. Trappel, & T. Tomaz (Eds.), The Media for Democracy Monitor 2021: How leading news media survive digital transformation (Vol. 2) (pp.85-146). Nordicom.

Ratinaud, P., & Marchand, P. (2015). Des mondes lexicaux aux représentations sociales. Une première approche des thématiques dans les débats à l’Assemblée nationale (1998-2014) (From lexical scopes to social representations. A preliminary thematic approach to the National Assembly debates (1998-2014)). Mots. Les langages du politique, (108), 57-77. https://doi.org/10.4000/mots.22006

Reinert, M. (1983). Une méthode de classification descendante hiérarchique: application à l'analyse lexicale par contexte (A descending hierarchical classification method: application to lexical analysis by context). Les cahiers de l'analyse des données, 8(2), 187-198. https://www.numdam.org/item/CAD_1983__8_2_187_0/

Reinert, M. (1997). Les "mondes lexicaux" des six numéros de la revue "le surréalisme au service de la révolution" (The "lexical worlds" of the six issues of the journal "le surréalisme au service de la révolution"). Mélusine, (16), 270-302.

Rodríguez Urra, C., Trillo Domínguez, M., & Herrero Solana, V. (2023). The irruption of digital natives on the Chilean media landscape: analysis of the academic impact in front of web and social networks (2004-2022). Brazilian Journalism Research, 19(1), e1572. https://doi.org/10.25200/bjr.v19n1.2023.1572

Sbalchiero, S., & Tuzzi, A. (2016). Scientists' spirituality in scientists' words. Assessing and enriching the results of a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews by means of quantitative approaches. Quality & Quantity, 50, 1333-1348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0208-y

Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2013). Mediating the message in the 21st century. A media sociology perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930434

Schudson, M. (1989). The Sociology of News Production. Media, Culture & Society, 11(3), 263–282.

Soroka, S. N. (2002). Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264-285. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.264

Stevens, F., & De Bruycker, I. (2020). Influence, affluence and media salience: Economic resources and lobbying influence in the European Union. European Union Politics, 21(4), 728-750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520944572

van den Heijkant, L., van Selm, M., Hellsten, I., & Vliegenthart, R. (2019). Intermedia agenda-setting in a policy reform debate. International Journal of Communication, 13, 1890-1912. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/11017

Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2017). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028-2049. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712086

Archivos adicionales

Publicado

2025-09-30

Cómo citar

Leroy, D., & Avendaño, O. (2025). Agenda-building and issue salience: the Water Code reform in the Chilean Press. Cuadernos.Info, (62), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.62.92106