Cross-platform hatedom: Influencers’ strategies for managing affective aversion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.60.85872Palabras clave:
fandom, discurso de odio, plataforma, redes sociales, toxicidad, seguidores, comunidad onlineResumen
Amidst the rise of toxic behavior in online fan communities, this study examines the construction of cross-platform hatedom through social media and the strategies influencers use to navigate hostile digital environments. Using a mixed methods approach, this study analyzes 16,215 comments directed at six influencers using advanced natural language processing techniques and pre-trained AI models. In addition, structured qualitative interviews provided insights into the influencers’ perceptions of their interactions with fans and haters and shed light on their strategies for dealing with hatedom. The results show that hatedoms, characterized by strong affective dislike, vary significantly in their levels of toxicity and emotional polarization on different platforms, including YouTube, X, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok and Twitch. Influencers employ various coping mechanisms, such as ignoring negative interactions, blocking malicious users, and using sarcasm as a defense mechanism. They also emphasize the importance of mental health and often limit their personal engagement to protect their wellbeing. This study highlights the need for a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach to understanding hatedom that combines insights into the polarization of the digital community with the implementation of advanced technological moderation. By prioritizing the mental health and resilience of influencers, it is possible to foster a healthier digital environment amidst the ever-evolving dynamics of fan behavior on social media.
Descargas
Citas
Abidin, C. (2018). Internet celebrity: Understanding fame online. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/9781787560765
Abidin, C. (2019). Victim, rival, bully: Influencers’ narrative cultures around cyberbullying. In H. Vandebosch & L. Green (Eds.), Narratives in research and interventions on cyberbullying among young people (pp. 199-212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04960-7_13
Aburime, S. (2022). Hate narratives, conditioned language and networked harassment: A new breed of anti-shipper and anti-fan–antis. Journal of Fandom Studies, 10(2-3), 135-155. https://doi.org/10.1386/jfs_00060_1
Association of Internet Researchers. (2012). Ethical decision-making and internet research. Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (version 2.0). https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf
Arouh, M. (2020). Toxic fans: Distinctions and ambivalence. Ex-centric Narratives: Journal of Anglophone Literature, Culture and Media, (4), 67-82. https://ejournals.lib.auth.gr/ExCentric/article/view/7917
Barnes, R. (2022). Loving to hate: Fandom fueling polarized behavior. In R. Barnes (Ed.), Fandom and polarization in online political discussion (pp. 61-86). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14039-6_4
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE.
Devlin, J. & Chang, M. W. (2018, November 2). Open sourcing BERT: State-of-the-art pretraining for natural language processing. Google Research. https://research.google/blog/ open-sourcing-bert-state-of-the-art-pre-training-for-natural-language-processing/
Díaz, J. E., Cortés, M., & Hinojosa, C. (2019). Detecting toxic interactions on the Twitter Star Wars fandom using machine learning. Tecnológico de Monterrey.
Duffy, B. R., Miltner, K. M., & Wahlstedt, A. (2022). Policing “fake” femininity: Authenticity, accountability, and influencer antifandom. New Media & Society, 247, 1657-1676. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221099234
Hoffner, C. A. & Bond, B. J. (2022). Parasocial relationships, social media, & well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101306
Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual Poachers: Television fans and participatory cuture. Routledge
Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers. Exploring participatory culture. New York University Press.
Lehto, M. (2022). Ambivalent influencers: Feeling rules and the affective practice of anxiety in social media influencer work. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(1), 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549421988958
Lind, J. & Wickström, A. (2024). Representations of mental health and mental health problems in content published by female social media influencers. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 27(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779231210583
Luo, Z. & Li, M. (2024). Participatory censorship: How online fandom community facilitates authoritarian rule. New Media & Society, 26(7), 4236-4254. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221113923
Maarouf, A., Pröllochs, N., & Feuerriegel, S. (2024). The virality of hate speech on social media. In J. Nichols (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (Vol. 8) (pp. 1-22). https://doi.org/10.1145/3641025
Martínez-Valerio, L. & Mayagoitia-Soria, A. M. (2021). Influencers y mensajes de odio: jóvenes y consumo de contenidos autocensurados. Revista Prisma Social (Influencers and hate messages: Young people and consumption of self-censored content). Prisma Social, (34), 4-39. https://hdl.handle.net/10115/30379
Mysiuk, I. & Shuvar, R. (2023). Automating web scraping of user comments for sentiment analysis in social networks. In 2023 IEEE 13th International Conference on Electronics and Information Technologies (ELIT) (pp. 77-81). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELIT61488.2023.10310867
OHCHR. (2023). Report of the Special Rapporteur on contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance on combating glorification of Nazism, neoNazism, and other practices that contribute to fueling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance. United Nations.
Ouvrein, G., Jorge, A., Cabral, J., & Vandebosch, H. (2023). Coping comes with the job: An exploratory study into the selection and use of coping strategies for online aggression among social media influencers. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 10, 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2023.100052
Riemer, K. & Peter, S. (2021). Algorithmic audiencing: Why we need to rethink free speech on social media. Journal of Information Technology, 36(4), 409-426. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211013358
Schuessler, J. (2018, November 14). ‘Toxic’ is Oxford’s word of the year. No, we’re not gaslighting you. The New York Times. https://bit.ly/3WdwxGh
Senft, T. M. (2013). Microcelebrity and the branded self. In J. Hartley, J. Burgess, & A. Bruns (Eds.), A companion to new media dynamics (pp. 346-354). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118321607.ch22
Sjoerd-Jeroen, M., Basten, F., Taran, G., Panagoulia, A., Coughlan, G., & Duarte, J. (2024). The structured narrative interview. Narrative Inquiry, 34(2), 307-334. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.23079.moe
Smith, M. M., Speth, T. A., Sherry, S. B., Saklofske, D. H., Stewart, S. H., & Glowacka, M. (2017). Is socially prescribed perfectionism veridical? A new take of the stressfulness of perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 115-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.031
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. SAGE.
Suler, J. (2006). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps.42
Théberge, P. (2006). Everyday fandom: Fan clubs, blogging, and the quotidian rhythms of the internet. Canadian Journal of Communication, 30(4), 485-502. https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.2005v30n4a1673
Valenzuela-García, N., Maldonado-Guzmán, D. J., García-Pérez, A., & Del-Real, C. (2023). Too lucky to be a victim? An exploratory study of online harassment and hate messages faced by social media influencers. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29, 397-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09542-0
Vizcaíno-Verdú, A., Contreras-Pulido, P., & Guzmán-Franco, M. D. (2020). Construcción del concepto fanbullying: Revisión crítica del acoso en redes sociales (Building the fanbullying concept: Critical review of social media harassment). Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, (57), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.12795/pixelbit.2020.i57.09
Von-Mettenheim, W. & Wiedmann, K. P. (2022). Hate speech and bad language: The ugly face of social influencers and its impact on brands. An abstract. In B. Jochims & J. Allen (Eds.), Optimistic marketing in challenging times: Serving ever-shifting customer needs (pp. 291-292). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24687-6_116
Walther, J. B. (2022). Social media and online hate. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45. 101298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.12.010
Archivos adicionales
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Arantxa Vizcaíno-Verdú, Paloma Contreras-Pulido

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.