This is an outdated version published on 2022-08-31. Read the most recent version.

Model studies on recycled whole rubber tyre reinforced granular fillings on weak soil

Authors

  • Tacettin Geckil Department of Civil Engineering, İnönü University, Malatya (Türkiye)
  • Talha Sarici Department of Civil Engineering, İnönü University, Malatya (Türkiye)
  • Bahadir OK Department of Civil Engineering, Adana Alparslan Turkes Science and Technology University, Adana (Türki-ye)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.21.2.264

Keywords:

Rubber tyre, geotextile, soil improvement, granular fillings, construction and demolition waste

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to determine the stress-strain behaviour of a rigid circular footing placed on recycled rubber tyre-reinforced granular filling built on weak soil. For this purpose, model plate loading tests were carried out on reinforced/unreinforced granular filling built with natural aggregates (NA) or construction and demolition waste materials (CDW). The rubber tyre used for reinforcement has become a waste material by completing its service life but it has retained its typical cylindrical shape. In model plate loading tests, the effects of the granular fillings, the type of fillings material and the placement of whole rubber tyre and/or geotextile in the granular fillings were investigated. Depending on the results of tests, it was determined that the bearing capacity was increased by reinforcing with the rubber tyre and/or the geotextile. Furthermore, it was specified that the highest increase in bearing capacity was occurred case of by reinforcing with the geotextile together with the rubber tyre of the granular filling. The CDW and the NA fills reinforced with geotextile together with the rubber tyre increased the bearing capacity of weak soils by 6.59 and 8.49 times, respectively, for the 5% deformation ratio. On the other hand, it was reported that although the bearing capacity of the NA was higher than that of the CDW, the bearing capacity of the reinforced CDW approached that of the NA.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbarimehr, D., & Aflaki, E. (2018). An experimental study on the effect of tire powder on the geotechnical properties of clay soils. Civil Engineering Journal, 4(3), 594-601. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-0309118

Altay, G., Kayadelen, C., Canakci, H., Bagriacik, B., Ok, B., & Oguzhanoglu, M. A. (2021a). Experimental investigation of deformation behavior of geocell retaining walls. Geomechanics and Engineering, 27(5), 419-431.

Altay, G., Kayadelen, C., Taskiran, T., Bagriacik, B., & Toprak, O. (2021b). Frictional properties between geocells filled with granular material. Revista de la construcción, 20(2), 332-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.20.2.33

Arias, J. L., Inti, S., & Tandon, V. (2020). Influence of Geocell Reinforcement on Bearing Capacity of Low-Volume Roads. Transportation in Developing Economies, 6(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-020-0093-5

Arulrajah, A., Piratheepan, J., Disfani, M. M., & Bo, M. W. (2013). Geotechnical and geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25(8), 1077-1088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000652

ASTM C117-13. (2013). Standard Test Method for Materials Finer than 75-μm (No. 200) Sieve in Mineral Aggregates by Washing. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0117-13

ASTM C127-12. (2012). Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Coarse Aggregate, ASTM Internation-al. West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0127-12

ASTM C128-12. (2012). Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity), and Absorption of Fine Aggregate. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0128-07A

ASTM C131-06. (2006). Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0131-06

ASTM C136-06. (2006). Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates, ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0136-06

ASTM D1557-12. (2012). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1557-12

ASTM D1883-14. (2014). Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils. ASTM International, West Con-shohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D1883-14

ASTM D2166-06. (2006). Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2166-06

ASTM D2487-11. (2011) Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-11

ASTM D4318-17. (2017). Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4318-17

ASTM D6270-08 (2008). Standard Practice for Use of Scrap Tires in Civil Engineering Applications, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6270-08

ASTM D698-12. (2012). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0698-07

ASTM D7928-17, (2017). Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis, ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7928-21

ASTM D854-10. (2010). Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D0854-10

Balunaini, U., Mohan, V. K. D., Prezzi, M., & Salgado, R. (2014). Shear strength of tyre chip–sand and tyre shred–sand mixtures. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 167(6), 585-595. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.13.00097

Bearden, J.B. & Labuz, J.F. (1998). Fabric for reinforcement and separation in unpaved roads. MN/RC-1999-04. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minnesota 55155. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11299/675 (Accessed:15.11.2021)

Binquet, J., & Lee, K. L. (1975). Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. Journal of the geotechnical Engineering Division, 101(12), 1241-1255. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000219

Briaud, J.L., & Jeanjean, P. (1994). Load settlement curve method for spread footings on sand. In Vertical and horizontal deformations of foundations and embankments, ASCE, 2, 1774-1804.

Cabalar, A. F., Karabash, Z., & Mustafa, W. S. (2014). Stabilising a clay using tyre buffings and lime. Road materials and pavement design, 15(4), 872-891. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2014.939697

Cetin, H., Fener, M., & Gunaydin, O. (2006). Geotechnical properties of tire-cohesive clayey soil mixtures as a fill material. Engineering geology, 88(1-2), 110-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.09.002

Chen, Q. (2007). An Experimental Study on Characteristics and Behavior of Reinforced Soil Foundation. PhD dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA. Online Available at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3361/ (Accessed:15.11.2021)

CWA (2002). Post-consumer tyre materials and applications. CEN Workshop Agreement, 14243-2002, CEN, Brussels.

Das, B. M. (2017). Shallow foundations: Bearing capacity and settlement. CRC press.

Das, B. M., Khing, K. H., & Shin, E. C. (1998). Stabilization of weak clay with strong sand and geogrid at sand-clay interface. Transportation Research Record, 1611(1), 55-62. https://doi.org/10.3141/1611-07

Duda, A., & Siwowski, T. W. (2021). Stability and Settlement Analysis of a Lightweight Embankment Filled with Waste Tyre Bales over Soft Ground. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-021-00184-5

Dunham-Friel, J., & Carraro, J. A. H. (2014). Effects of compaction effort, inclusion stiffness, and rubber size on the shear strength and stiffness of expan-sive Soil-Rubber (ESR) Mixtures. In Geo-Congress 2014: Geo-characterization and Modeling for Sustainability, 3635-3644. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413272.352

EN 933-3. (2012). Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates - Part 3 : Determination of particle shape – Flakiness index. British Standards Institution, London, United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.3403/BSEN933

Edinçliler, A., & Yildiz, O. (2017). Numerical Study on Seismic Isolation for Medium-rise Buildings Using Rubber-Sand Mixtures. In Fourth conference on smart monitoring, assessment and rehabilitation of civil structures.

Edinçliler, A., & Yildiz, O. (2018). Seismic behavior of tire waste-sand mixtures for transportation infrastructure in cold regions. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions, 7(5), 626-631. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1226.2015.00626

Han, J., Pokharel, S. K., Yang, X., Manandhar, C., Leshchinsky, D., Halahmi, I., & Parsons, R. L. (2011). Performance of geocell-reinforced RAP bases over weak subgrade under full-scale moving wheel loads. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23(11), 1525-1534. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000286

Holtz, R.D., Christopher, B.R., & Berg, R.R. (1998). Geosynthetic design and construction guidelines. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, FHWA-HI-98-038, pp. 1-460, Available at: https://trid.trb.org/view/1151460 (Accessed:15.11.2021)

Indraratna, B., Sun, Q., & Grant, J. (2017). Behaviour of subballast reinforced with used tyre and potential application in rail tracks. Transportation Ge-otechnics, 12, 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.006

Ingle, G. S., & Bhosale, S. S. (2017). Full-scale laboratory accelerated test on geotextile reinforced unpaved road. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 3(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0110-x

Kayadelen, C., Önal, T. Ö., & Altay, G. (2018). Experimental study on pull-out response of geogrid embedded in sand. Measurement, 117, 390-396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.12.024

Kazimierowicz-Frankowska, K. (2007). Influence of geosynthetic reinforcement on the load-settlement characteristics of two-layer subgrade. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 25(6), 366-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.01.002

Khing, K. H., Das, B. M., Puri, V. K., Yen, S. C., & Cook, E. E. (1994). Foundation on strong sand underlain by weak clay with geogrid at the interface. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 13(3), 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(94)90035-3

Kiptoo, D., Aschrafi, J., Kalumba, D., Lehn, J., Moormann, C., & Zannoni, E. (2017). Laboratory Investigation of a Geosynthetic Reinforced Pavement Under Static and Dynamic Loading. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 45(1), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20160170

Krishna, A. M., & Biswas, A. (2021). Performance of Geosynthetic Reinforced Shallow Foundations. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 51, 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-021-00546-3

Liu, L., Cai, G., Zhang, J., Liu, X., & Liu, K. (2020). Evaluation of engineering properties and environmental effect of recycled waste tire-sand/soil in geotechnical engineering: A compressive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 126, 109831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.109831

Love, J. P., Burd, H. J., Milligan, G. W. E., & Houlsby, G. T. (1987). Analytical and model studies of reinforcement of a layer of granular fill on a soft clay subgrade. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 24(4), 611-622. https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-075

Mehrjardi, G. T., Azizi, A., Haji-Azizi, A., & Asdollafardi, G. (2020). Evaluating and improving the construction and demolition waste technical properties to use in road construction. Transportation Geotechnics, 23, 100349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100349

Meyerhof, G. G., & Hanna, A. M. (1978). Ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on layered soils under inclined load. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 15(4), 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1139/t78-060

Mohajerani, A., Burnett, L., Smith, J. V., Markovski, S., Rodwell, G., Rahman, M. T., ... & Maghool, F. (2020). Recycling waste rubber tyres in construc-tion materials and associated environmental considerations: A review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104679

Molenaar, A. A., & van Niekerk, A. A. (2002). Effects of gradation, composition, and degree of compaction on the mechanical characteristics of recycled unbound materials. Transportation Research Record, 1787(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.3141/1787-08

Ok B. (2018). Investigation of the behaviour under static and cyclic loading of construction and demolition waste embankment reinforced with geosynthet-ics. PhD dissertation, Cukurova University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Adana, Turkey. Available at: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/giris.jsp (Accessed:15.11.2021)

Ok, B., Sarici, T., Talaslioglu, T., & Yildiz, A. (2020). Geotechnical properties of recycled construction and demolition materials for filling applications. Transportation Geotechnics, 24, 100380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100380

Ornek, M. (2009). Yumuşak kil zeminlerin geogridle güçlendirilmesi. Cukurova University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Adana, Turkey. Available at: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/giris.jsp (Accessed:15.11.2021)

Ornek, M., Laman, M., Demir, A., & Yildiz, A. (2012). Numerical analysis of circular footings on natural clay stabilized with a granular fill. Acta geotech-nica slovenica, 9(1), 61-75. Available at: http://fgserver6.fg.um.si/journal-ags/2012-1/article-4.asp (Accessed:15.11.2021)

Pokharel, S. K., Han, J., Leshchinsky, D., Parsons, R. L., & Halahmi, I. (2010). Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(6), 570-578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.002

Reis, G. S. D., Quattrone, M., Ambrós, W. M., Grigore Cazacliu, B., & Hoffmann Sampaio, C. (2021). Current applications of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition: A review. Materials, 14(7), 1700. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071700

Saribas, I., & Ok, B. (2019). Seismic performance of recycled aggregate–filled cantilever reinforced concrete retaining walls. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 11(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814019838112

Sarici, T. (2019). Puzolan ile güçlendirilmiş inşaat ve yıkıntı atıklarının granüler dolgu olarak kullanılabilirliğinin değerlendirilmesi. PhD dissertation, Inonu University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Malatya, Turkey. Available at: https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/giris.jsp (Ac-cessed:15.11.2021)

Sharma, V., Kumar, A., & Kapoor, K. (2019). Sustainable deployment of crushed concrete debris and geotextile to improve the load carrying capacity of granular soil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 228, 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.306

Sitharam, T. G., & Hegde, A. (2013). Design and construction of geocell foundation to support the embankment on settled red mud. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 41, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.08.005

Sivakumar, V., McKinley, J. D., & Ferguson, D. (2004). Reuse of construction waste: performance under repeated loading. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 157(2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2004.157.2.91

Trouzine, H., Bekhiti, M., & Asroun, A. (2012). Effects of scrap tyre rubber fibre on swelling behaviour of two clayey soils in Algeria. Geosynthetics International, 19(2), 124-132. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2012.19.2.124

Vieira, C. S., & Pereira, P. M. (2015). Use of recycled construction and demolition materials in geotechnical applications: A review. Resources, Conserva-tion and Recycling, 103, 192-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.023

Yadav, J. S., & Tiwari, S. K. (2016). Effect of inclusion of crumb rubber on the unconfined compressive strength and wet-dry durability of cement stabi-lized clayey soil. Journal of building materials and structures, 3(2), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.242643

Yildiz, Ö. (2021). Numerical Analysis of Geotechnical Seismic Isolation System for High-Rise Buildings. Naturengs, 2(1), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.46572/naturengs.872231

Zhang, L., Zhao, M., Shi, C. & Zhao H., (2010). Bearing Capacity of Geocell Reinforcement in Embankment Engineering. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28(5), 475-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.011

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31 — Updated on 2022-08-31

Versions

How to Cite

Geckil, T., Sarici, T., & OK, B. (2022). Model studies on recycled whole rubber tyre reinforced granular fillings on weak soil. Revista De La Construcción. Journal of Construction, 21(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.21.2.264